Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | jean-emmanuel depraz | 9-5 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | sebastian james | 7-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | tchuco | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | robert borkowski | 8-6 | None |
| Rakdos Midrange | ryohei takezawa | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Control | oruç aslan | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Skeletons , Esper Pixie , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Snuff Out ranks #4088 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 80%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Snuff Out is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.24 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Snuff Out has a win rate of 51.8%, making it 8.1% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augur of Bolas | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 8 | 53.4% | 0 |
| Ninja of the Deep Hours | Creature — Human Ninja | 5 | 52.1% | 0 |
| Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 9 | 50.9% | 1 |
| Lotus Petal | Artifact | 6 | 50.2% | 0 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 10 | 49.0% | 0 |
| Dispel | Instant | 17 | 48.9% | 0 |
| Stormbound Geist | Creature — Spirit | 9 | 48.7% | 0 |
| Troublemaker Ouphe | Creature — Ouphe | 7 | 48.3% | 1 |
| Faerie Seer | Creature — Faerie Wizard | 8 | 47.8% | 0 |
| Relic of Progenitus | Artifact | 14 | 47.3% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Snuff Out than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesmeric Fiend | Creature — Nightmare Horror | 2 | 5 | 63.3% | 55.4% | +7.9% |
| Troublemaker Ouphe | Creature — Ouphe | 2 | 7 | 59.4% | 52.1% | +7.2% |
| Echoing Decay | Instant | 2 | 5 | 62.8% | 55.7% | +7.1% |
| Faerie Seer | Creature — Faerie Wizard | 1 | 6 | 61.8% | 54.7% | +7.0% |
| Fanatical Offering | Instant | 2 | 9 | 57.9% | 51.3% | +6.6% |
| Thorn of the Black Rose | Creature — Human Assassin | 4 | 19 | 61.8% | 55.5% | +6.3% |
| Agony Warp | Instant | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 54.1% | +5.9% |
| Cast Down | Instant | 2 | 19 | 58.5% | 53.1% | +5.5% |
| Tithing Blade | Artifact // Artifact | 2 | 8 | 57.9% | 52.6% | +5.2% |
| Lembas | Artifact — Food | 2 | 7 | 64.3% | 59.1% | +5.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 12 | 0.5% | 29.3% |
| Golgari Midrange | 11 | 1.3% | 36.4% |
| Dimir Bounce | 11 | 2.1% | 45.9% |
| Esper Pixie | 8 | 0.4% | 36.5% |
| Golgari Graveyard | 7 | 10.3% | 27.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.